Wednesday, September 07, 2005 - Posts

Windows Vista and what it means to your pocket/life...

Reading the APC section on Vista and what Nigel Page (MSDN Australia) said about Vista's hardware requirements makes me shivver

Nigel Page is a strategist with Microsoft Australia. He told APC today that Vista would work best on a video card with more than 256MB RAM, 2GB of DDR3 memory and a S-ATA 2 hard drive.

Well it is a year away, so theres not much of an issue there (well with DDR-III, SATA-II not really 'there yet'), what concerns me the most is the DRM technologies MS have "bundled" with Windows to make the big boys and gals in Hollywood happy:

"In Longhorn, the computer determines that a video card is not faked or being intercepted, so there's a lot of onus on the writers of the drivers. It also checks If there are digital or analogue drivers. If only digital outputs are in use, it will then check a display has HDCP capability – high bandwidth digital content protection. The communication between the video card and the device is encrypted and only decrypted by the display device itself. If all that is true, the operating system says, "ok, gotcha, we are running on a protected video path which is OK for premium content… HD-DVDs, BluRay, or a video file that someone has marked."

"If you don't comply with PVP, we're going to downscale the quality upon playback… you're going to get a lower quality version; you're not going to get the high def content the way it was intended to be viewed. You'll find that most plasma displays have HDCP already. But this isn't available in computer monitors. I have not been able to find a single monitor that supports it. We are going to see a lot of change in this space.

So in otherwords, theres lots of encryption going on under the hood (one of the reasons why Vista will work better in dual-core/multi-core environments) so people cant play Videos or "hax0r" then like they used to.

"There's a LOT of encryption and decryption going on. We communicate on the PCI Express bus in a fully encrypted format because it is considered a public bus.

"The downside is that all your existing flat panel monitors and projectors aren't going to work with high-def videos in Vista. Bad news."

That last part nearly broke my heart. The lovely 2405FPW is useless when Vista RTMs...

So, will i drop everything and convert to Linux? Maybe daringly move over to Mac (maybe even grab an iPod and jump around trying to "act cool")? Hell no! Theres still 1 year to go and while I'm using other OS's outside of Windows (FreeBSD, Fedora and to a lesser extent OS X Tiger) I dont consider such a rush to move to a new OS just yet.

On a side note however, those of you who run Beta 1 and find its running "faster than XP" is because (as the article states) a bulk of the GUI code is now sent to the GPU, this alone makes Windows far more responsive along with the new graphics subsystem.